SearchUser loginOffice of CitizenRest in Peace,
Who's new
|
What does the future really hold for Lake Erie, in times of global warming?Submitted by Norm Roulet on Mon, 07/07/2008 - 16:35.
I lived for a while in Bay Village, along Lake Erie, and the views, microclimate, and bugs were amazing. When I first moved there, I used to take my dog down to the water, at a little "swimming" area by Columbia Road, until we went swimming there after a storm and then both got sick as dogs, and the dog's fur started falling out. I've stayed ashore, since... and keep my kids away from the lake. Perhaps the water is not entirely unsafe, between rains, but all that shit and worse that flows into the lake, when the storm drains and sewers overflow into the lake, stays in the lake. And what industry and shipping dumps into the lake, stays in the lake... or turns into fish many eat. So is this a good use for the lake? Who cares, much less may make a difference? And what does the future really hold for Lake Erie, in times of global warming? It seems all government leaders and popular media of the region are convinced the lake may serve shipping, industry, recreation, food and sewage together, but this doesn't seem to be working well to lots of international environmental and healthcare experts. So how do we sound an alarm and start changing public perception about the purpose of our natural resources, so more citizens may live better lives and lobby their leaders to lead better, and the media to report better, for the environment. May these days of $4+ gas, global warming, and believing in change spark a new era of activism against pollution, and polluters. There are many things individuals may do to improve the quality of Lake Erie, if encouraged to do so. An important example would seem to be using rain-barrels and diverting downspouts into well designed yards. People should reduce paved surfaces on their properties, and incorporate water management into land and building planning. Regional government leaders must take a role planning the future of Lake Erie and our other natural resources, and better manage water on city and county. While the mayor of Solon may not manage a lakefront community, every mayor in the region leads a lakefront region, and must ask is the highest and best use of the lake a dumping ground... and are they not partly to blame, and responsible for finding solutions. It seems this is one concern every politician in NEO may agree on. Who is leading this charge in NEO today... ? Who is prepared to stand up to the port, and industry, and government, and inspire others to do the same, at the grass roots level regular people may understand? Only one person... Citizen Hauser. It is criminal this entire region, for all it wastes on poor leadership, has not produced financial support for Ed, as he serves the public. Perhaps in times of global warming such proven environmental leaders in the community will be sought out, entrusted and compensated rather than shunned by the establishment... when the establishment finally realizes they need citizens' help to survive, as they too are citizens.
|
Recent commentsPopular contentToday's:All time:Last viewed:
|
Step1
Go to any water department, county or state office that "supposedly" keeps Lake Erie clean.
Step2
Find political hire in said department, be it mayor's child, relative of county "boss" hired for political gain, or any know-nothing who was hired mainly to get a sopranos like politician elected for his 20 consecutive term.
Step3 Beat him so badly he cannot return to work at said department, forcing to hire competant person in know-nothing's place.
Yeah...I'm frustrated living here all my life.
Step 4: Go to Case and do the same
Unfortunately, the problem is not isolated to government, as there are few examples of private people and organizations in NEO being progressive about water, either... look at this typical scene at Case, where there are acres of grass being watered on what is otherwise a "green roof" (over a subsurface garage)... the huge case campus could be feeding their community, or those around them, or at least helping reduce water waste and run-off... I wonder what is Case's carbon footprint vs. Carnegie Mellon, a college Case likes to consider a peer, and Cleveland's footprint vs. Pittsburgh, a city we consider "competition", which seems far ahead of us by actually being progressive... like by actually being green...
Disrupt IT
Green Practices and roof at Carnegie Mellon make differences
Carnegie Mellon appears to be world-class being green... here is a green roof on their campus, and they have a website dedicated to their green practices. I came across an interesting paper suggesting Rice University learn from Carnegie Mellon's "Green Practices"... read through this and browse their site to appreciate the proper development of a green culture over time, and the results. How are we doing at our 23 colleges and universities in the region? How did the retiring president of Cleveland State really do? How green he mades the campus, students and community during his tenure... how green have been and will be his building projects... those are the measures of that man that will really matter over time. Are our educators too proud, or ignorant, to learn from world-leaders?
What about with the $ billions in new projects under construction and development right now with University Hospitals and the Clinic... how about all those houses being built by area community development corporations...
Here is some good thinking for Rice, which offers insight for all our school and community leadership...
Disrupt IT
Best header, yet
Water, water, everywhere and not a drop to drink. The frustration is more than palpable here in NEO. Time for a revolution?