Corporate schools =?

Submitted by lmcshane on Mon, 02/01/2010 - 09:44.
GOOD
12% (2 votes)
BAD
24% (4 votes)
$$$$ in the right folks pockets
12% (2 votes)
bottom-line kids suffer
29% (5 votes)
need more choices
24% (4 votes)
Total votes: 17
( categories: )

beyond the picture given to us

If we could let go, just momentarily, and look at the educational landscape of Cleveland in 5 years if this plan goes through. Right now, we are embroiled in the details of the neighborhood schools devastation. The plan calls for the turnover of a significant portion of the schools to be run privately and in those to be charter schools, no mention of how the public owned property will be dealt with, not mention of locally employed Clevelanders, no mention of accountability to the public at all.

Corporate schools and the Military Complex

America, you let this happen. In the words of President Eisenhower:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

  • and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.